Thursday, 20 July 2017

One Website, Finally (Mostly) Finished

I feel like I've been working on my website since approximately the day, more than a decade ago,
when I first started selling fiction.  Back then (and probably today) it was one of those pieces of advice always given out to writers who were just starting out: you've got to have a website or no-one will ever take you seriously!  This turned out to be largely nonsense, of course*, and for a long time, Writing on the Moon - as I called my site for no discernible reason that I can remember - was a horrid, rotting albatross corpse around my neck, as I struggled with shambolic design software to try and produce something that didn't utterly embarrass me.

Things got better when I moved my business from Streamline - may their name live in infamy until the last star burns out in the sky! - to Wix, who are actually pretty great, despite some occasional ups and downs.  Since then I'd like to think that the site's been basically okay.  But I was still hamstrung by some older elements that I couldn't find the time or the energy to redesign, and at the end of the day my graphic design skills aren't exactly the greatest.

Short story long, I've finally managed to get around to the last bits of overhauling.  That mostly means I've fixed the banner to a degree that I'm actually happy with, but there's been a lot of less visible tweaking under the hood too.  And really, there's a fair bit of content up there, if I do so say myself: details on all of my books and short stories, links to anything remotely relevant that can be linked to, samples for all three Easie Damasco books and Level One, a trailer for Giant Thief, a free (albeit ancient!) story and details of every other story that can be read or listened to for free, not to mention a bio that tells you basically nothing except an obvious lie that I'm hoping no-one will pick up on.

Nevertheless, I won't kid myself that it's anywhere near perfect.  And a part of the reason for this post is to ask: What am I missing?  What isn't working?  Should I delete the whole thing and just post kitten pictures?  (I'm not doing that.)  If you have a minute then maybe take a look, and if you have another minute I'd love to hear your thoughts: you can find the site here.**




* After all, it's not like anyone takes me seriously with a website!
** Of course, it's perfectly possible you're reading this on my website, in which case this post must be really confusing!

Tuesday, 11 July 2017

Film Ramble: Drowning in Nineties Anime, Pt. 26

Say what you like about this batch, it's a varied selection.  We've a surreal comedic sci-fi franchise movie, a swords and sorcery OVA based on a computer game, demonic horror manga adaptation and a surreal mockumentary spliced with the re-imagined history of its animation studio.  And okay, including that last one, Otaku no Video, is a bit of a cheat; there's nothing much like Otaku no Video anywhere in any medium.  And I suppose we also can't ignore the fact that three out of four of those are adaptations of one thing or another.  But let's not expect miracles, eh?

This time: Urusei Yatsura Movie 4: Lum the Forever, Wizardry, 3x3 Eyes and Otaku No Video...

Urusei Yatsura Movie 4: Lum the Forever, 1986, dir: Kazuo Yamazaki

I went into Lum the Forever conscious of its reputation as the Urusei Yatsura movie that's all but impossible to parse, the one that's little more than a collection of random scenes strung together by the ghost of a plot, the one that was a hefty but muddled bout of fan service to see the then-concluding series off in something approaching style.  But truth be told, none of those things especially bothered me.  There certainly is a plot and I can even more or less summarize it for you: stirred by to the chopping down of an ancient cherry tree, the town of Tomobiki gains a sort of sentience formed from the collective subconscious of its inhabitants, recognises Lum's alien presence and attempts to erase her from existence.  Indeed, once the film managed to stumble through an aimless first third, I found that plot quite engaging.  And though there are scenes that seem intended to do justice to individual characters rather than the given story, they're in the minority.  No, while the narrative wasn't up there with the best, it certainly didn't ruin Lum the Forever for me.

You know what did?  The crappy animation.

For the first time we're slap bang in the realms of telly moviedom - note the 4:3 TV standard ratio! - and my goodness but it shows in just about every shot.  Really, even back in 1986, I'd be willing to believe that TV anime could muster better efforts than this.  Even elements that traditionally stand out despite a limited budget fail to do so here; the backgrounds are muddy and uninspired, and the action sequences are about as crummy as everything else.  From top to bottom, Lum the Forever looks as though it was made in a rush.  If this really was the end of Urusei Yatsura, it would be a hell of a shameful way to send the franchise into the hereafter.

With all of that in mind, it's tricky to say whether Yamazaki's direction is up to anything terribly impressive.  It's possible to imagine a version of the film with animation on a par with, say, Beautiful Dreamer, that would be pretty interesting to look at, and that alone suggests that the visual storytelling is there in at least skeleton form.  Nevertheless, of everything I've seen by the director, this is certainly Yamazaki at his least inspired, which again makes me think that the movie was a rushed job.  All that argues against is a strong score by seeming franchise newcomer Yukio Kondô; apart from that, not one element fails to suggest that speed above all was the driving imperative.

And here I am making Lum the Forever sound terrible, which it certainly isn't.  Really, if my theory's right and this was rushed together to capitalize on nostalgia roused by the end of such a long-running and much-loved show, it could certainly have been a hell of a lot worse.  There are some fantastic ideas floating about, and the whole level of weirdness appealed to me; Lum the Forever is only less strange that Beautiful Dreamer because it's less successful in sustaining a mood.  I'd rate it as the least of the films so far, but then bad animation makes me cross; if you've watched and enjoyed any of the earlier movies, I wouldn't argue for skipping this one.  At its best, it's delightfully mad, and at its worst it looks rubbish but is at least still delightfully mad.

Wizardry, 1991, dir: Shunya Fujioka

First, a disclaimer: the 1991 OVA adaptation of the seminal Wizardry role-playing video game series was never released in the UK or America, so that the only way to watch it with English subtitles is via a fansubbed version that's easily found floating around on the internet.  I feel the need to get that out of the way because, not being a fan of piracy, I try and track down legitimate copies whenever I can, but also because in theory it gives an idea of the level at which to set your expectations, given some of the things that were picked up for release outside of Japan.

That already offers us a few reasons to assume Wizardry might be awful, but there are others.  Take director Fujioka, for example, who according to IMDB had never worked in anime before and would never do so afterwards.  Or take the Wizardry games themselves, which, though seminal, are more or less precisely what you'd expect from a D&D-inspired game series at the dawn of the last decade of the twentieth century and didn't exactly offer up a wealth of intricate plot.  For that matter, a couple of minutes of watching are enough to establish that the budget wasn't mind-blowing, nor the ambition to break any molds: clichéd fantasy heroes hack and slash at clichéd fantasy monsters in a quest for a big clichéd chest of treasure, and really the only detail that isn't a cliché is the fact that two fighters and a ninja makes for an awfully weird party.

Yet what should doom Wizardry to mediocrity or worse is actually what makes it a bit delightful: it's just so damned literal.  Our heroes are actually adventures who really do spend their days looting a ten floor dungeon with a fearsome boss antagonist at its lowest level.  An early plot-splurging tavern sequence reveals that there are other parties who do the same.  Healing spells can reattach severed limbs, and characters can even be reincarnated, so long as their corpses are dragged to the right temple.  Wizardry is faithful to its source material in a way that feels shockingly rare and almost daring; the degree of thought that's gone into taking a nonsensical world and making sure that it functions enough to be plausible for the span of just under an hour is rather commendable.

I'm biased, of course, on any number of levels.  I have a soft spot for early fantasy video games, just like I have for nineties anime, and I'm in the middle of writing a novel series that attempts something not wholly dissimilar with the tropes of classic fantasy.  Nevertheless, there's no denying that Wizardry does what it does more than adequately.  At its worst, it's at least functional; the frame rate, for example, is obviously low, but Fujioka has enough of a handle on his material that it's never bothersome.  The characterization is largely nonexistent, but the voice acting and designs are good enough to compensate.  The music is pleasant, if not memorable.  Nothing is actively bad, much is pretty good, and most importantly, the sum total just works: not as any kind of a masterpiece of course, but as an amiable, surprisingly determined stab at using one medium to bring another to life in a way that's neither ironic nor condescending.

3x3 Eyes, 1991, dir: Daisuke Nishio

The four part OVA of 3x3 Eyes marks a landmark of sorts, as the first time I'm reviewing something with which I have more than a passing acquaintance with the source material; I actually read and enjoyed a good portion of the 3x3 Eyes manga back in the day. Which is to say, for once I had some meaningful expectations going in beyond "this is meant to be good" or "oh no, not more tentacles."

Though, thinking about it, both of those would have been sensible preconceptions.  3x3 Eyes has a solid reputation, and it does get a bit tentacle-y in places, though thankfully not half so much as it might.  At any rate, we're firmly in the demonic horror tradition that characterizes so much work from the period.  Teenager Yakumo stumbles upon Pai, apparently a girl of about his own age, who reveals that despite appearances she's a member of an extraordinarily long-lived mystical race known as Sanjiyans.  But before he can ask much in the way of questions, the pair discover that Pai's pet pterodactyl-monster Takuhi is terrorising the city, and when they try to intervene, it focuses its terrorising on Yakumo by killing him stone dead.  That is, until Pai reveals that she shares her body with another much less friendly consciousness, one that restores Yakumo to life as her immortal servant.

From thereon we have Pai questing to become human, the threat of another, evil Sanjiyan reawakening (well, more evil, Pai's alter ego is pretty mean) and lots of Yakumo dying, generally in astonishingly gory ways.  3x3 Eyes may have a bit more plot than the average 90's horror anime, but that's not to say it skimps on the blood and guts.  In fact, the horror is pretty effective in places; in particular, the second episode genuinely took me by surprise, and then genuinely freaked me out.  I mean this as praise, by the way: some of this stuff, like Legend of the Overfiend, is shocking, but not much stands up as effective horror.  Perhaps because it bothers with things like story and characterisation before diving into the demons and evisceration, 3x3 Eyes manages more punch.

On the technical front, the animation is of the reliably good sort, to the extent that nothing really blew me away; the odd shot of Pai in the last episode, maybe, and I'm always glad of a show that fusses over its character moments.  Anyway, the compensation is that reliably good means just that.  The same goes for the largely instrumental score, which is effective stuff, full of pleasing nods to Pai's Tibetan heritage, but also content to support the drama without too much calling of attention to itself.  Again, this is no bad thing; really, it's nice to see such a focus on solid storytelling.  And that, thankfully, is something 3x3 Eyes offers in spades.  For once we get an interesting narrative with some genuinely original ingredients, and if the characters are more familiar, they're at least worth spending time around.  Particularly cheering is the fact that, despite being an early chunk of yet another hugely long-running series, the OVA manages to reach a resolution of sorts.  Nothing really gets wrapped up, but the status quo gets enough of a jolt and the last moments are enough of a new beginning that we're left with the sense of an ending, if not quite the thing itself.

Of course, not everything is perfect.  The odd bit of goofy humour is misplaced, and a more serious issue is the burgeoning romance between Yakumo and Pai; she's portrayed as so childlike that it comes off as more creepy than cute, and never becomes a satisfactory motivation as the creators seem to believe it should.  But while a useless central romance proves quite a flaw, especially in the final episode, it's also not enough to undo the good work done elsewhere.  3x3 Eyes remains a real standout, good enough to get me caught up in a subgenre I tend to be pretty cold towards, and I'm eager to dip into the sequel.

Otaku no Video, 1991, dir: Takeshi Mori

Okay ... this one's going to take a bit of explaining.

Probably anyone reading this already knows, but just in case, Otaku crudely translates to nerd - though importantly, you can be an Otaku on just about any subject so long as you're sufficiently obsessive.  And what Otaku no Video is above all else is a tribute to Otaku, though it's nearly as much a mockery, and also something of a critique.  Most of the more negative stuff is clustered in the documentary footage that makes up roughly half of the two fifty minute episodes, and which consist of a series of interviews with anonymous Otaku.  Oh yes, and those interviews are most probably faked, with the interviewees really being members of the studio, Gainax, behind the film.  Which sort of makes sense, because the animated portions of Otaku no Video, following an innocent named Kubo who gets lured by his geeky friend Tanaka into the dark waters of Otaku-dom and eventually sets his sights on becoming the ultimate Otaku, is also a thinly veiled and heavily fantasised telling of Gainax's own origins.

Got all that?

At any rate, it makes more sense while you're watching it, at least once you settle into its odd rhythms.  The interview footage and anime segments comment on each other in clever ways, creating a neat dialogue between fiction and reality (even if that reality wasn't all that real.)  And the ambition on display is remarkable; Otaku no Video really feels like an attempt to be the last word on its subject, not so much because it's comprehensive but because it lurches in so many different directions.  It's at once history, overview and prediction, homage and pastiche, a catalogue and a deconstruction of Otaku-ism.  And from the perspective of 2017, it's an extraordinary piece of cultural archeology.  After all, what's covered here is the birth of a new means of consumption and appreciation of culture, and something similar was happening at the same time in both Europe and the US - enough so that I found myself alternately cheering and cringing at much of what was on screen.

It's disappointing, then, that as a work of anime it can't be just a tiny bit better.  Given the knowledge of what Gainax could do - this is the studio behind masterpieces like Wings of Honneamise, Gunbuster and the mighty Neon Genesis Evangelion - the fact that the animation is, until the last few minutes, resolutely used to represent real world scenes that aren't especially visually interesting feels like a missed opportunity.  (Though the animators do manage to cheekily insert some footage from their legendary opening to the Daicon IV convention, which if you haven't seen it you should watch right this second!)  At least Kôhei Tanaka's parody score is terrifically good fun.

The inevitable question, I suppose, is what appeal a half-documentary, half anime OVA from 1991 chronicling the rise of Japanese nerd culture has to offer to the modern viewer.  As a work of entertainment, I've already highlighting a couple of imperfections; to that could be added that the story told in the animated sections is interesting more than fascinating, though it gains from knowing how it's mirroring real events.  But the truth is that time has been generous to Otaku no Video, more so than to most anime from two and half decades ago; what was recent history when it was made now feels indescribably ancient in a multitude of subtle ways, a candid glimpse into a reality long gone and in many ways almost forgotten.  Yet what's equally striking is how much what's presented here is the foundation of our current age, in which so many of the niche hobbies presented are now thoroughly mainstream.  All of which is to say that, as anime, Otaku no Video is pretty good, but as a time capsule of a cultural epoch, it's priceless.

-oOo-

So what will next time bring?  More of the same, most likely.  My nineties anime buying has slowed considerably; I think this time I really have picked up everything that can be found for a reasonable price in the UK, and though there are a few titles I'm still curious about, it's a case of watching out for those super-rare affordable copies that pop up every few months, or perhaps never.

Does that mean there's an end in sight?  Given how often I've claimed there might be and been wrong, I think the only possible answer is "Um, maybe."  At any rate, I suspect I'll hit the big thirty without too much trouble!  There are certainly a few things left on the shelf that I can't wait to get to...



[Other posts in this series: Part 1Part 2Part 3Part 4Part 5Part 6Part 7Part 8Part 9Part 10Part 11Part 12Part 13Part 14Part 15Part 16Part 17Part 18Part 19Part 20Part 21Part 22Part 23Part 24, Part 25]

Thursday, 29 June 2017

The Future is Futurequake

I'm getting a bit bored of mainstream comics lately.  In fact, I feel like mainstream comics are getting bored of mainstream comics; what other reason could there be for the endless reboots and reimaginings and re-whatever-the-hell-else's?  And for the first time since when I first got into comics way back when, it feels like all of the interesting stuff is happening elsewhere.  I mean, would anyone seriously argue these days that Marvel or DC are putting out better books than, say, Image?  Well, perhaps, but they'd be wrong.

In other news, the UK still has a comics industry.  Okay, maybe not an industry, but it still has more than enough talented creators to support one; all that's lacking is the publishers and the readership.  As far as I can judge, there's 2000AD and then there's Futurequake, and honestly, in my experience, your chances are a great deal better of getting published in the latter.  But you know what, that's okay, because Futurequake is seriously impressive in its own right, and has grown all the more so since I last had work in there a few years back.  It's a proper indy comic that looks as good as just about anything out there, and it's a hundred pages long, which makes for a particularly cheap graphic novel in this day and age.  And those pages are packed full of quirky, original work of the sort that's becoming so vanishingly rare in the world of comic books.

For example: Conservationists.  The first draft of my script dates back a heck of a way, and was one of those nonsensical ideas I never know when to let go of.  The short version is, what would an alien invasion look like from a nonhuman perspective?  In this case, the nonhuman is an urban fox just trying to get by, and in my original draft the invasion was very much background detail; after all, what would a fox give a damn?

Dave Evans, Futurequake head honcho, liked the notion but wanted to see a bit more action, and then Anthony Summey - who'd soon after because my co-conspirator on C21st Gods - was heavily into the alien designs and the violent, explodey stuff, and the end result was not a great deal like what I originally had in mind.  Which, lest it sound like I'm complaining, is undoubtedly a good thing.  What Anthony, and to a lesser extent Dave, nudged this little story towards being is a heck of a lot more fun than what I first envisaged, while still maintaining that core concept of how the alien annihilation of humankind would seem like much, much less of a big deal if you're weren't a human.

Should you be up for reading it, along with lots of other stories by a whole load of talented writers and artists, you can grab a copy of Futurequake 2017 from their website; it should be available by the time I post this or very soon after.

Friday, 23 June 2017

Narrating is Hard, Who Knew?

It's not like I haven't always had a ton of of respect for narrators.  And I've had reasons enough to listen to them.  For some unaccountable reason, a disproportionate amount of my work has found its way into podcast or audiobook: all four of my novels, novella Patchwerk, and a dozen of my short stories have all had the audio treatment, and to the best of my recollection not once have I been less than thrilled with the results.  I've been really lucky on that front, and maybe that's one of the reasons I quickly started to notice how tough reading fiction out loud was, let alone doing so without stumbling over every other line, let alone while bringing genuine emotion and life to the work.

Still ... when you try it yourself, you discover that narrating is really damn tough, and that the people who do it professionally are really damn talented.  I mean, it's not like I've never had to read stories out loud, and sometimes I've even done so in front of quite large groups of people.  But if you fluff that then you can blunder through or make a joke about it, and really volume tends to be the main thing that matters in those situations, so if any actual subtlety or drama creeps in then I feel like I've done a decent job.  Actually making a recording of a story, though?  That's a whole other thing.  One significant mistake and you've had it and - as I discovered to my cost - just going in without the right amount of joie de vivre is enough to make for a rubbish end result.  Reading for thirty-five minutes without major slip-ups and without letting your energy flag is a heck of a challenge.

About now is when I should explain why I was even trying, right?  Basically, the answer is, because the folks at Great Jones Street asked me to, and those guys are cool enough that I didn't mind giving it a go.  If you haven't downloaded the GJS app by now, you really should; it's a huge library of short fiction by a ton of big name (and not quite so big name!) authors, and it's completely free.  More to the current point, it contains four of my stories: Jenny's Sick, Great Black Wave, and my two tales following master assassin Otranto Onsario, Ill-Met at Midnight and A Killer of Dead Men.  And the folks at GJS decided that it would be neat if their readers could be listeners too, so long as what they were listening to was authors reading out their own fiction.

In fairness, I should admit that I was largely extent imposing my own difficulties: Great Jones Street didn't ask for flawless renditions, and indeed specifically requested the exact opposite, suggesting that their audience would much prefer more warts-and-all renditions.  But, you know, you can tell a perfectionist not to try and get things perfect until you go blue in the face and it won't make a damn bit of difference.  Fortunately for my sanity, what did was sheer lack of time, not to mention a good deal of luck - otherwise I'd have been at this all year.  As it was, I managed to get by with only a few minor hiccups and one fairly major one, too far into A Killer of Dead Men for me to start over yet again.  What can you do, right?  "City" and "roof" sound awfully similar.

Anyway, for anyone who's curious, here's me reading out Great Black Wave, which is perhaps my favourite of the four stories and, not at all coincidentally, probably the one I did the best job with.

video

And, again, you can find the Great Jones Street app and so listen to all four, as well as lots and lots of other stuff, here.

Sunday, 18 June 2017

The Black River Chronicles 2 Levels Up

As of the start of this week, I've now more or less finished the second draft of Level One sequel and number two Black River Chronicle, the book tentatively titled The Ursvaal Exchange.  I say 'more or less' because I plan to do a bit of tweaking and polishing over the next couple of weeks, and to work through some minor issues flagged up by my ever-brilliant and almost too reliable friend and beta-reader Mr. Tom Rice, who agreed to help out at awfully short notice.

(I don't know that I've written a book that Tom hasn't had at least some influence over, and I probably don't thank him enough.  Thanks again, Tom!)

The second draft has been, I have to admit, kind of an uphill slog - which is strange given what a breeze the first was.  Or maybe that's so strange?  Looking back, that first run through was such a pleasure because I was caught up in the story I was telling and enjoying being back with this cast of characters that I'm more than a little in love with.  Perhaps it's no wonder I ended up waxing a bit too lyrical!  But all of that lyrical wax needed to be boiled down to serviceable prose at some point, and the last few weeks have seen a lot of boiling.

Then there's the fact that this second chronicle, as befits a sequel, is operating on a rather grander scale.  It's a good bit longer, it juggles more characters and digs more deeply into all of them, and - I think the biggest change - it has some seriously involved action sequences.  The thing is, Mike and I were determined that the challenges our heroes met were going to scale to match the fact that they're now level two adventurers, and that meant stacking the odds against them in a way we'd never have dreamed of in Level One.  And that means some serious threats, the sort that make a few angry rat-people or the odd murderous unicorn pale into insignificance - which in turn requires the sort of elaborate action that spreads across multiple chapters and locations.

Thinking about it, that might be the real reason this second draft has been so tough.  Maybe because I find it easy to get caught up in the excitement when I'm writing it, action tends to be the most difficult challenge at the editing stage.  The result, though, is a couple of sequences I'm seriously pleased with, and that feel so much bigger than anything that happened in Level One - a book that was, after all, always intended to be more intimate than epic.

So what happens next?  Well, after those two weeks of tweaking I'll be talking a month away to let my brain reset.  Then August will be given over to the third and final major draft, to be followed in close succession by copy-edits and proofreading and by the book actually coming out in October or thereabouts - which actually seems awfully close now that I come to think of it!

Monday, 12 June 2017

Film Ramble: Drowning in Nineties Anime, Pt. 25

For once I'll keep this opening brief!  The thing is, I had this whole other introduction finished, a rather defeatist musing upon how, despite my best intentions, I'd yet again managed to review stuff that was at best merely very good.  But what do you know?  That was before I watched - and wholeheartedly loved! - Venus Wars, and on average the final result is maybe the strongest set we've had yet.

With that in mind, let's just get on with discussing Battle AngelUrusei Yatsura Movie 3: Remember My Love, The Heroic Legend of Arslan and (of course) Venus Wars.

Battle Angel, 1993, Hiroshi Fukutomi

On the face of things, the two part, sixty minute OVA known in various places as Battle Angel, Battle Angel Alita and Gunnm (my personal favourite being the title card's Hyper Future Vision Gunnm) isn't up to anything especially remarkable for the time it was created.  Really, in the mid nineties, you couldn't have thrown a brick in the anime world without hitting a darkly futuristic story of cyborg humans living high-tech but low value lives amid decaying cityscapes.  And, oh, the lead cyborg is cute and female?  The antagonists look like they've wandered in from Fist of the North Star?  At first glance, it's hard to see why the title is as remembered as it is, let alone why this would warrant Robert Rodriguez and James Cameron teaming up to release a megabudget live action movie next year.

The truth is, it does and it doesn't.  Battle Angel falls into a category we've encountered a few times in these reviews: it does familiar things a great deal better than almost anyone else was even attempting.  A big part of that is that it really commits to its elements, no matter that they're less than entirely fresh.  Its hellhole of a city, surviving off the scraps of a possibly Utopian and certainly technologically superior second city anchored in the sky above, has the vibe of a real and lived-in place.  It takes the subject of cyborgization somewhat seriously, and cements it deep into the plot.  Its characters, especially titular battle angel Gally, are developed with care and feel unexpectedly substantial as a result, especially taking into account the brief running time.  Even the violence is fussed over in a way that makes it legitimately shocking rather than callow or silly.  Battle Angel takes itself seriously, then strives to justify that self-seriousness.

It helps, inevitably, that the technical values are terrific, bolstered in great part by detailed, distinctive character designs and the aforementioned efforts at world-building; the brief bursts of action are particularly lovely, and the attention to detail with which Gally's ass-kicking is accomplished probably has a fair bit to do with her legacy.  As with, say, Bubblegum Crisis, the coolness factor goes an awfully long way here.  Fukutomi's direction, too, is good enough to make me sad that he hasn't done much since; he has a real grasp of tone and of how to tell a story clearly and economically.  And though the music is more of a mixed bag, a piece reminiscent of Akira's iconic soundtrack is the perfect companion to the show's by turns winsome and horrific nature.

With all of that said, Battle Angel is tough to get hold of these days, and I personally paid rather more for it than was sensible.  Honestly, I'm not sure it's that good; it's too much within the mold of what anime was at the time to be classed as any kind of masterpiece.  Nevertheless, it's a brief and memorable pleasure, made with real style and care, and I liked it enough to already be feeling vague dread at what the Hollywood take will end up looking like.

Urusei Yatsura Movie 3: Remember My Love, 1985, dir: Kazuo Yamazaki

Perhaps it's a stretch to assume that Kazuo Yamazaki considered himself in competition with Mamoru Oshii.  Nevertheless, it's easy to imagine a bit of a rivalry there; between them the two directed the vast bulk of Urusei Yatsura's staggering number of episodes, and Yamazaki found himself with the unenviable task of following up on Oshii's second feature Beautiful Dreamer, which - whatever the contemporary reaction might have been - was unquestionably something out of the ordinary.

A glance at Yamazaki's CV tells us that he's no Oshii, but also that he was no mere drudge.  He would go on to make Five Star Stories, A Wind Named Amnesia and the first Slayers movie, all of which I've raved about to a greater of lesser degree here.  And sure enough, Remember My Love is no step down into hackwork, not at all: I'd go so far as to say that it's even a clear improvement from Only You, Oshii's first stab at Urusei Yatsura moviemaking.  Nor does it quite turn its back on the crazy levels of ambition shown by Beautiful Dreamer; no mere franchise movie this, content to deliver familiar beats at a longer length and with some polished animation.

In fact, one might argue that Remember My Love is a step closer to the platonic ideal of what a Urusei Yatsura movie should be.  It stays relatively true to what I understand the spirit of the show to have been and manages to find things for a great many of the vast cast to do, while also interrogating its source material in surprisingly deep fashion, as a misguided curse threatens to separate alien princess Lum from her lecherous "darling" Ataru for good.  It dares to ask the sorts of questions every fan must have at least considered - like, are these two actually good for each other?  And are they really meant to be together?  Or even, isn't this just a show about two destructive people perpetually screwing each other's lives up?

This has one other side effect: much like Oshii's movies, Remember My Love isn't exactly funny.  There are scattered laughs, and moments of genuine hilarity, but there are also stretches without even the shadow of a joke.  Really, the plot is the draw; that and the production values, which are also in no way a step down.  Yamazaki certainly isn't as daring a director as his predecessor, but there are some terrific sequences, and a lengthy chase around the midpoint is show-offy in all the best ways.  The score, too, is another strong effort, with some screwy carnival melodies and a couple of likable pop songs.

Really, Remember My Love makes three for three on impressive Urusei Yatsura movies.  It's not indispensable in the way that Beautiful Dreamer is, but that's a silly bar to set, right?  It's still fun, imaginative and in places astoundingly weird, and it's still far bolder than the average TV adaptation, in anime or otherwise.  It's well worth a look, basically, and bodes well for the rest of what so far has been a shockingly reliable movie series.

The Heroic Legend of Arslan, 1991 - 1995, dir's: Mamoru Hamatsu, Mihiro Yamaguchi

Trying to say anything useful about The Heroic Legend of Arslan presents a whole raft of issues, even more so that trying to make sense of the average nineties anime release two decades on from its release.  What you get (at least if you acquire the most available and complete DVD release from Central Park Media) is two hour-long movie episodes directed by Mamoru Hamatsu, followed by two half hour OVA's directed by Mihiro Yamaguchi and made by a different studio, followed by another two OVA episodes, made years later and subtitled Age of Heroes for no discernible reason, once again directed by Hamatsu - oh, and with a different dub, featuring a new cast who sound nothing like the originals.  Also, the pronunciation of many of the characters' names changes midway.  And the narrator announces a major character dead only for them to later return.  Confused yet?

The wildly varying budget certainly doesn't help matters, nor does the shift in directors; Hamatsu's work is slick and often stylish in a way Yamaguchi barely tries to match, and this is even more prominent with Age of Heroes, where Hamatsu compensates for a lack of actual animation budget by doubling down on sheer eye-popping imagery.  In a way, the strangest thing is that, despite all the behind the scenes changes, the story simply keeps picking up where it left off; it's like the only people not aware of the chaos were the creators themselves.  As for that story, my thoughts kept going to Game of Thrones, if Game of Thrones had a prettier cast and slightly less bloodshed and was loosely based on sixth century Persian history rather than the War of the Roses.  Scuppered by his father's belligerent and headstrong nature, not to mention his utter lack of military strategy, the boy prince Arslan finds himself on the run with his kingdom in enemy hands and, at least initially, only a handful of friends to defend him.  But, as the story develops, events move from the small scale of Arslan's early struggles for survival to a grand narrative of battles, strategy and politicking that rapidly drew in more characters and countries than I could readily keep track of.

The result is all over the place, as I've noted often enough already, but certainly more good than bad; really, it's never bad, just a bit lackluster around the middle.  However, if the only issues were the inconsistent animation and direction and dubbing then I'd still cheerfully recommend The Heroic Legend of Arslan.  In fact I do, I guess, but more hesitantly, for here's the thing: what we have here is an adaptation of a series of light novels that's been on the go for thirty whole years and still isn't finished and this version doesn't wrap up even slightly.  There's no closure.  Not one meaningful subplot even ties up, and in fact the last episode sends the story off in a whole new direction.  And damn but it's frustrating.  Four hours is a long time to spend getting absorbed in something that just stops dead.

And still, The Heroic Legend of Arslan is worthy of your time.  Its somewhat fantasized historical setting, which takes in locales rarely seen in anime or elsewhere, its focus on grand, nation-spanning drama over traditional swords and sorcery, its likable and diverse cast, its lush soundtrack and frequently lovely imagery all make it worth giving up those four hours for - or at the least, worth watching the two opening movies.  And if it weren't for the pain of that non-ending I suspect I'd be being very positive indeed.

Venus Wars, 1989, dir:  Yoshikazu Yasuhiko

First things first: Venus Wars looks extraordinary.  I mean, my mind kept going back to Akira, and while it's admittedly not that good - what in pre-twentieth century anime that wasn't made by Studio Ghibli is? - it at least belongs in the same conversation.  This, by the way, is helped no end by a remastered print from the ever-wonderful Discotek, which is crystal clear and pops with colour and in no way resembles a print of a film from nearly three decades ago.  Seriously, Discotek deserve medals for their work here, and it breaks my heart a little that there's no UK blu-ray release.

This is the sort of animation that refuses to let you forget for an instant that it's the time-intensive, hugely costly product of dozens of skilled artists.  No expense is spared in showing scene after scene of almost unnecessarily complex things happening: in particular, Makoto Kobayashi's mechanical designs are marvelous organic oddities that must have been an absolute horror to animate.  Yet they're constantly in motion, glorious single-wheeled motorbikes battling against tanks that look like they were grown rather than built, all amid billowing dust and teeth-rattling explosions.  Venus Wars, on the whole, has splendid action scenes: varied, ingenious and never superfluous to the plot, every one's a pleasure to behold.

It's not just eye candy, though.  If we're being honest, that's probably the level the film succeeds most on; that and the score by notable genius Joe Hisaishi, back from before he became that guy who does the music for every Miyazaki movie.  But while its story of civil war on a crudely terraformed Venus is hardly revolutionary, the way its told is satisfyingly novel.  Our leads are Susan Somers, a visiting journalist from Earth, and Hiro, a biker with a sizable (though thankfully not Tetsuo-sized!) chip on his shoulder, and together they bring a skewed perspective to what might easily have been just another sci-fi war story.  Both quickly find themselves disgusted with either side of the conflict, and even as they get increasingly forced to take a stance, they remain sufficiently on the outside to remind us that wars are crappy things inevitably fought for all the wrong reasons.

Which isn't to suggest Venus Wars is any kind of pacifist tract, or even that it's terribly sophisticated in its ideas: when push comes to shove, it's too devoted to its delirious action sequences to be much of either.  But its narrative is mature and engaging, and even that's a heck of a thing for a sci-fi anime movie from the tail end of the eighties.  Really, its imperfections are minor and relatively easy to forgive.  Music-wise, cutting short the eighties-tastic Shakunetsu no Circuit in favour of the rather boring Asu e no Kaze over the closing credits is a weird old misstep.  The character designs had a tendency to deform into a cartoonishness that wasn't wholly to my tastes, maybe the closest the film comes to cost cutting.  And it's attitude towards women isn't fantastic, though for the time and the genre it actually kind of is; we get three major female characters and two of them have significant agency and development.  Sadly the same can't be said for the one gay character who appears briefly, only to camp it up horribly and die about a minute later, without having acquired even the shadow of a personality trait.

But that's all the bitching I'm willing to muster against Yasuhiko, whose debut this was, working from the source material of his own manga.  As a first movie, Venus Wars is a rare achievement, and though anyone who's made it this far into these reviews probably won't be terribly surprised that it flopped and Yasuhiko never got to direct again, still, it's a pretty devastating fact to discover.  Venus Wars has shot straight into my list of all-times favourites, and I'm already itching to watch it again; I doubt I'll be disappointed.

-oOo-

Really, when The Heroic Legend of Arslan is your weakest entry, and its biggest flaw is that it leaves you wanting more, you know you've reviewed some seriously good nineties anime.  There's certainly nothing here I wouldn't recommend at least a little, and Battle Angel and Venus Wars both fall into the category of things I'd urge most anyone to track down.  In fact, Remember My Love kind of does, too; I'm getting to the point of thinking that these Urusei Yatsura movies are something pretty special.

And we all know what this means, right?  The next entry is going to be terrible.  Like, M. D. Geist 2 terrible.  It's destiny, man, and you can't escape destiny.



[Other posts in this series: Part 1Part 2Part 3Part 4Part 5Part 6Part 7Part 8Part 9Part 10Part 11Part 12Part 13Part 14Part 15Part 16Part 17Part 18Part 19Part 20Part 21Part 22Part 23, Part 24, Part 26]

Tuesday, 30 May 2017

Trying to Make Sense of Twelve Years of Short Story Sales

One thing about doing anything for a long time is that it's easy to lose sight of the bigger picture.  After over a decade of selling short fiction, I had only the barest sense of how well I'd done overall.  In terms of profit, some years had been startlingly successful, where others had been more or less disastrous; there were stories I sold to major markets on the first or second attempt and others, in my opinion no less good, that I eventually had to let go for a few bucks.  Really, the only way to make sense from such arbitrary-seeming peaks and troughs, let alone to gain an impression of whether all the effort I'd put into writing and selling short fiction had been warranted, would be with a ton of data and the obsessive-compulsive nature to dig through it.

Wouldn't you know ... I have both of those things!  And just recently I also had the time and incentive to sit down and figure out what stories I've sold, for how much and how often, and then to stick all of that information into an easily interrogated spreadsheet that I could prod for some answers.

The main question I was eager to solve was to what extent all those highs and lows had balanced each other out.  But before I even began running numbers, I was conscious of a couple of significant distorting factors.  I definitely learned to write and sell short fiction the slow, painful way, by spending a long time producing work that wasn't quite up to scratch or else was wildly ill-suited for professional sale, and then refusing to give up on any of it.  The upshot was that, in the early years, I ended up getting paid not much at all for a fair proportion of my output, or even giving stories away for free - which, of course, skews the data dramatically.  Then, as a wrinkle in the other direction, perhaps the majority of my sales these days are reprints, which means more money for stories I've already sold once (or, increasingly, more than once.)  Thanks to Digital Fiction Publishing, I also now have short stories earning royalties; and thanks to both Digital and NewCon, I have further royalties coming in from my short story collection The Sign in the Moonlight and Other Stories.

Taking all of that into account left me with a few potential numbers.  Based on the raw data, my average pay rate for the eighty stories I've had published would be somewhere around three and a quarter cents per word, or just over half of current professional rates.  Add in the Sign in the Moonlight royalties and that rises past three and a half cents.  Disregard all of those unpaid publications and it nudges up past four cents.

On the one hand, when you consider the hours I've put in - approximately seven trillion by this point - even an average rate of four cents a word would be paltry.  On the other, given the extent to which that's being dragged down by those early low-earning sales, it suggests that in fact the stories that have been successful - whether through getting into well-paying markets or reprint sales or royalties or a combination of the three - have down rather more than I'd ever have guessed towards balancing things out.

Though it's tough to draw conclusions that would be useful for anyone but me from a career that's followed no clear trajectory or logic, let's at least try.  I already knew that, in the long term, you can routinely make decent money from selling short fiction, and on rare occasions you can make extremely good money; it's also become more and more apparent that, if you're careful with what rights you sell and for how long and if you're aggressive in seeking opportunities, the most successful stories will keep being successful time and again.  What my new data adds is a sense that my early misjudgements, or for that matter the occasions that still sometimes happen when I end up letting a story go for less than I'd like because I'm eager to be involved with a particular market or editor, aren't the big deal I've sometimes felt them to be.  While of course it would be lovely to have every piece end up with the likes of Clarkesworld or Lightspeed, the impression I have now is that maybe the scatter-shot approach I've taken makes more sense than at times it's felt like it was doing.  I've never made things easy for myself by writing in such a variety of genres and styles, but it's reassuring to discover that the results, on average, have been at least a qualified financial success.